Post Freudian theorists and their theories Essay

As indicated earlier, key personality learningal theories that were developed after(prenominal) Freuds psychoanalytic theory were either directly derived of it or aimed at criticizing some of its major components. a) Erik Erickson i) St get ons of growth Barbara (2008) and Lieberman (2007) agree that the work of Eric Erickson was a direct derivative instrument of Freudian considerations in human development. Eric Erickson theory of psychosocial development concurred with Freudian view that life, development and challenges develop in fix ups.Psychosocial theory further builds the notion of the ego which was largely brought out by Freud as external reality inculcation to ones mind. Particularly, the microscope stages of Erickson psychosocial development powerfully cohere with Sigmunds work. Clara et al (2008) explain that stage one of Ericksons theory of psychosocial development is reflected by trust versus mistrust largely because the child is entirely dependent on the caregi vers.Like Freud mentioned the pleasure a child derives from oral stimulation, Erickson emphasized on the resulting intimacy as a platform in propelling the child to the next stages. Therefore, Ericksons first stage borrows the concept of external environment in creating nice force for the next stage. In the second stage of psychosocial development, Erickson equally borrows from Freuds anal stage which is a critical training factor. Nelson-Jones (2005) explains that from a higher consideration, Erickson argued that learning to go to the toilet gave a strong consciousness of control and therefore great independence.As Freud clearly brought out the notion of the ego, Ericksons third stage of initiative versus guilt emphasizes the assertion of power and control which plays an important role in the later stages development. Erickson indicated that many children seek to assert their superiority among others but with careful considerations of the existing repercussions (Marrie and Jannek e-van, 2007). Notably, Erickson agrees with Freud that parents and caretakers must step in to urge on the needed reassurance and therefore avoid guilt to their young ones.It is however worth noting that Erickson strongly differed with Freud on how massive development persists in an individuals life. While Freud postulated that personality development only lasted to the genital stage when an individual starts getting interested in sexual relationship with those of the opposite sex, Erickson postulated that developed progressed to the old age (Busch, 2009). However, scholars appear to be strongly divided with one group considering the latter Ericksons work to be based on criticism of the Freuds work and therefore its advancement (Barbara, 2008).ii) The notion of fixation wizard resilient notion of Freuds work is the notion of succession between different stages. Though they do not necessary cohere on time and expected repercussions, both theorists agree that people at different sta ges must go through them successfully or get fixated (Hayes, 2004). Fixation as enthalpy (2009) point out denotes the inability to progress since latter stages are entirely dependent on the former stages success. Erickson argued that all stages present an individual with two negating outcomes positive and negative.For example between year five to eleven, Erickson indicated that a successful individual will become industrious while the unsuccessful ones will suffer unfavorable position (Laura and Pam, 2007). b) Lacanian theory In his work, largely referred to as the return of Freud, Emile Lacans concepts appear to be fully be by the former (Adam, 2008). Though Lacan strongly criticized the Freuds separation of the conscious (ego) and unconscious (id), he largely employed the same concepts in his work.Lacan argued that the conscious and unconscious considerations of the mind were not different, but operated from a super sophisticated and complex outline compared to Freuds consider ation. Locan mirror as Brickman (2009) and Gottdiener (2008) conclusions suggest is formative and a derivative of the experience an individual gets during development. Therefore, the paradigm of the imagery to be effective during the younger years as contrasted to the old age which is more subjective fits the Freudian connotation of development persisting only to the genital stage.